Maximum Ink Photo Album
Do you think it's sexy? Many of you do and proved it by flooding us with some amazing photos. From head to toe we saw it all, and trust us, we saw EVERYTHING. There wasn't a tattooed body part we didn't see.
Not only were the tattoos incredible to look at, many of them had touching stories behind them. Many were representing a personal rebirth while others remembered a loved one. Several were fun and whimsical while others were dark and mysterious.
Check out the collection from your fellow gay.com members! Maybe one will inspire you to get one of your own.
Know any women with some great ink? Have them send us a photo!
Tattoos not your thing? Check out the other member photo albums we've put together.
|
|
|
|
Posted by Gay.com on May 4, 2009 in Featured Members
| Back to gay.com
Thanks for the feature and including my picture. For those not attracted to the tatts, be respectful in your comments. We don't aim to please you with our ink. The endless battle over tatts being sexy/trashy will never be solved. Agree to disagree and move on.
Posted by: BlueStreet | May 04, 2009 at 06:43 PM
wow! dillon's famous lol
Posted by: curious8611 | May 04, 2009 at 06:48 PM
Even though I am strongly attracted to tats, they are out--its no longer novel. That reality is gone!
bye bye blue, black, yellow and red.
Posted by: zarxo | May 05, 2009 at 05:16 PM
Thanks for the article as well as using my picture.
I love my tat's and I personally think tat's on others are sexy as hell.
Posted by: downtowndallasdp | May 05, 2009 at 05:30 PM
love ink! its always beautiful to see
Posted by: marcelino angeles | May 05, 2009 at 08:01 PM
Anyone who ever says that something is "IN" or "OUT" as a novelty - has never been IN with a clique & will always be OUT.
Either you like Tattoos or you don't.
I personally look at the overall person & wouldn't just hook up with someone just for his cool tattoo as I am sure it wouldn't define him.
I like some tattoos that don't overwhelm the entire body.
Pic one is too much & Pic 2 here of a gun is tasteless and sort of brainless to me to have ones self tagged for the rest of there life even it they do get them removed leaves an ugly scare.
But to each there own.
Posted by: greg m | May 06, 2009 at 02:15 AM
It all depends on the tastefulness of the Tatts, and the Guy its on. I'd get a tattoo if I think it would look good on me. It would have to be something that expresses ME.
Posted by: msb45a | May 06, 2009 at 08:48 AM
Once in awhile I have seen a tastefull tatt and tastefully placed. But lately way to many are over the top of tasteless.
Posted by: gean l | May 06, 2009 at 08:39 PM
i think i have alot of better looking tattoos than the people u put on the site but thats just my personal opinion
Posted by: Kody | May 06, 2009 at 09:14 PM
They can look good on an already good looking person for about ten years. After that tattoos begin to look like newsprint smudged off on their skin. Fighting words....
Posted by: corrective_unconscious | May 06, 2009 at 10:42 PM
ok no so wrong people get tattos to show status or for beauty or art in general for you to say u didnt get ur tattoo for a reason other than u wanted a tattoo then your the one thats fake. all my tattoos represent a part of my life or are my life in some way except for my sleeve and thats just for artistic value cuz it looks fucking amazing. and i drew it myself and why not have art on your body atleast i didnt pick it out of a book like most people that get tattoos
Posted by: Kody | May 07, 2009 at 03:17 AM
I might go ahead and design my own tattoo- one that expresses me. I am an artist who works in Oils and acrylics. maybe use the image that I sold on a 16x20 piece. I still have the right to use it. I'd like it on my right pecs.
Posted by: msb45a | May 07, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Hello Gay.com Viewers I dont know what U think But i totaly Think Tatts are Hott. and they give that hott Bad boy attitude so I say Go Get inked and Be Gay and Merry haha:)
Posted by: kristina lopez | May 07, 2009 at 01:51 PM
I have two tattoos. they are both memory tats as both friends that they stand for were inked. I have an ankh on my right shoulder for eric and a rosary w/aids ribbon around my left nipple for josh. both died of aids related problems. some may consider tattoos to be "out", but i would never consider mine to be "out" or "in".
Posted by: dakotamichel | May 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM
This was a nice enough photo gallery. A lot of pics were too far away to make out the tat, which was a bit weird. I also can't understand censoring tattoos for this blog, even if they are on the genitals. Jeez, who runs this site anyway, some sort of right-wing group ashamed of the human body? IF the dude sent in a pic with his dick, show it for Christ's sake. It's a adult GAY site! What is the censoring about?
It was WAY too weird to see the blur of the censor's tool. Very distasteful and disturbing. You guys were way outta line with that call.
Oh, and to zarxo, (the bitchy, trendy queen): tattoos were never in, or out, they've simply always been. Take your overblown design/fashion sense and stick to your trendy shades, hairstyles, and hipster jeans. Nobody cares what you think is in or out. Your critique is ever so tiresome, and oh so very OUT.
Posted by: xmormondude | May 11, 2009 at 06:36 PM
Sexy-hot r cold, n or out? Who cares man---it's always been what the inner fire of desire projects/wants and if a tat corresponds then what's the deal? Sexy is sexy, I never have gotten this categorization stuff. Yer sexy with or without.
Posted by: aaron richard | May 11, 2009 at 07:20 PM